In
1983, I was on the ground floor of a management transition from the Traditional Style of Management to the Team Concept of Management in a small
foam & flexible fabrics factory in Auburn Hills, Michigan outside of
Detroit. At that time, the automotive industry was making a major conversion to
this en vogue management style, and started to require its vendors to follow
suit to maintain lucrative contracts. This movement was considered cutting-edge thinking at the time because it was open to interpretation about how to
proceed. New ideas and new ways of doing business were challenging old ideas
and old ways of doing things at every bend of the road. This created tension,
eroded the trust factor between current management and employees. It also taxed
and crumbled an already ineffective communication structure. My consultant work
was initially identified as 1) establishing a new Training Department and 2)
training employees to establish and maintain the new management system. Training
was broken into 3 different major areas: 1) White collar employees, 2) Blue
collar employees and 3) Sales staff. There were 2 shifts, and 350+ employees.
My
original assessment pointed to a serious problem in communication between
teams, shifts, union and management, and new/established workers. The
establishment of common ground understandings were enhanced by an in-house
created booklet that explained what the factory did, the process of the
manufacturing line, and the function of each of the teams. Seeing themselves as
being a collective part of an understandable process started to build the One team made of many teams cultural
thinking change. Employee’s contributed to the Wall of Fame employee board
recognizing accomplishments by individuals and teams, and a company newsletter
went into production so that news channels would signify a new and improved was
for sharing information. A two-hour training class was delivered to each team
in the factor to help establish the benefits of better communication. It was
well-received and started a momentum towards the change process.
The
next step was clearly to give the teams the structure to govern team choices
and 6 major areas were identified as a start point for training: 1) Mission
Statements, 2) Ground Rules, 3)Goal-Setting, 4) Goal realization (within
established time frames), 5) Recognition and Rewards, 5) Team Assessment, and
6) Problems solving & Conflict resolution. The training was inter-active,
and was based on criterion-based performance objectives. Demonstration of
understanding was measured based on the learning that took place and could be
verbally explained, explained in writing, and using hands-on activities.
Our success
after one year was presented at the Michigan Labor/Management Council in
Lansing, Michigan because we had the highest profits ever after using this
system. Employee Quality of Life and Increased Production were the two major
accomplishments of change under this new system. None of it could have been
accomplished without first establishing a communications structure that could
support the change. Better communication leads to better trust, allowing for
emerging leaders to be identified and utilized.
About the Author: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/nancy-bell/30/231/855
About the Author: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/nancy-bell/30/231/855
No comments:
Post a Comment